Crashing Riding errors which lead to crashing follow distinct patterns.
#1
Posted 21 December 2006 - 07:00 PM
Riding errors which lead to crashing follow distinct patterns. Once detected they can be used to make huge leaps forward in skill and confidence.
Reasons To Improve
My experience is that riders come to school for a variety of reasons. They say: to be safer, faster, more in control, learn the skills, have more confidence, get their knee down, improve and so on.
Beneath all of these reasons and consistent with each is a very fundamental personal reason: riders don't want to crash. Everyone wants to experience the maximum freedom and exhilaration with the minimum of danger; and I fully agree with this.
For the school staff, this principle works out just fine. If a rider crashes on a school day, no one wins: we are deprived of the opportunity to finish up what we started and so is the rider. It puts kinks in the day for everyone involved.
Conventional Wisdom On Crashing
Unfortunately there is still a lot of really bad advice out there on crashing: "You don't know how fast you can go until you crash," is one of them. "There are riders who have fallen and those that are going to fall," that's another one that makes crashing seem inevitable. These pieces of "conventional wisdom" miss the mark by miles. They are actually harmful.
I'm not saying that you can get through all of life without falling down. You may. But riders have and will continue to crash, bin it, fall down, go down, throw it away, pitch it, drop it, put it down and lose it.
A significant rider error, when aggravated and compounded by the rider's "corrections", can result in violating the machine's inherent stability leading to a bike and rider going down. That is the negative.
Errors Follow Patterns
On the positive side, there are key indicators of these basic errors and they follow a pattern. I say positive because if you intend to improve someone's riding, but don't have a clue about these indicators, you may see errors and try to correct them but miss their underlying pattern, which in turn creates a mystery as to why the rider suddenly runs off track, scares him/herself or falls down.
These indicators do have patterns and are specific in how they look. They generally break down into two main categories. 1) the riders who look uncertain and choppy as they commit them, a sort of advanced case of new rider syndrome and 2) riders appear to have abandoned their senses like someone with their first unlimited-purchase credit card. They are purposeful, very positive and absolutely committed to their silly riding. You see what can only be described as blind faith in the bike and the tires with absolutely no idea of limits and how these limits may be correctly approached and eventually controlled.
Steering Drill
Those of you who have already done the school may remember the simple steering drill we did with you in the paddock or skid pad area.
There are 6 corrections we can make on how the rider relates to the bike as it's steered into a corner with that drill. Riders feel more in control of the bike from any of the six corrections, once corrected. However, one of the primary reasons we do the steering drill is to prevent them from making mistakes that, under very common circumstances, can lead to running wide, running off the track or even crashing.
When the coaches see these errors they know where the rider is going and what he thinks he is trying to do and how bad it can get if not corrected.
The Timid and The Brave
Some riders can't get comfortable with the no limits idea the track provides and actually ride slower than they do on the street. While at the other extreme, some riders go on vacation from the laws of physics, speed, lean angle and common sense. Whichever mode they tend toward, certain patterns quickly develop in their riding that, to the trained eye, spell TROUBLE.
I hope I don't blow any other schools out of the water with this but, all schools, all track days, all racing and of course street riding have crashes. Some people call them accidents but rarely are motorcycle crashes accidental; they are caused, more often than not, by the rider's own hand.
Statistics on Crashing
I bring this up because of what has happened at our school over the past year and a half. For the previous 25 years we had a pretty consistent attrition rate due to crashing. All in all it wasn't horrible, about one and a half million school miles to what you might call a serious crash: more than a broken collarbone or bruises kind of thing.
Because we pay attention to how riders are riding I was convinced it had more to do with the phases of the moon or something than observable riding patterns but we've had a fresh look at this and it began to resolve in the riders' favor. Once we began to really see the errors and what they meant, what seemed like accidents or fate turns out to be lack of technical skills and is very correctable.
What happened? Well, when you have a 50% improvement in anything you know that you are on the right path and we have, on average, cut our crash rate in half. Considering that we have more school days and hence more students now than ever before, that floats my boat.
Preventative Measures
We are becoming pro at spotting these patterns and nipping them before they progress to the run-off-the-track or crashing stage. Looking at it from another perspective, students have told me for years that crashing on the track is most probably many, many times ?safer? than on the street. But one of the great rewards of teaching this sport are the scores of students who have come back and told us of the horrible riding situation that they avoided because they knew what to do.
I'm not saying that we can make you a safe rider. I'm not saying that you can't crash at my school, you certainly can. Fortunately, we recognize something about ourselves and our sport: if riding was not dangerous it wouldn't be nearly as much fun. We know the risks, we like the risks and we love the rewards of taking them. It makes perfect sense to me. Taking risks, with understanding, makes a rider as safe as he or she can be.
Problems Lead to Improvement
The other huge positive that has come out of this evolution is that riders are made more aware of the points that get them into trouble. It may sound crazy but more often than not the "fatal" mistakes (resulting in poor control or catalysts to crashing type errors) mistakes are actually aspects of riding that the student felt were some of their best points. Clearing up these misguided ideas alone can open the door for vast improvement with any rider.
If this seems like I'm patting ourselves on the back, you are right. Crashing is a huge area of rider fear and eliminating 50% of the crashes on average is another milestone for us.
You have plenty of reasons to learn the skills of riding. We are doing our level (very) best to see that you get what you want with your riding and we are winning at it every school day. You will too.
See you at the track.
Keith Code
Copyright Keith Code, 2006, all rights reserved.
#3
Posted 24 December 2006 - 07:08 PM
Once again you have taken a muddled up subject and put your eloquent, poingant hand to it. Congratulations. Well done. One of these days I'd love to see what you have to say about taking roadracing skills to the sport of Supermoto... a home for us old guys getting away from superbikes.
Kurt
#4
Posted 15 January 2007 - 05:05 AM
vonconcepts, on Dec 24 2006, 07:08 PM, said:
Once again you have taken a muddled up subject and put your eloquent, poingant hand to it. Congratulations. Well done. One of these days I'd love to see what you have to say about taking roadracing skills to the sport of Supermoto... a home for us old guys getting away from superbikes.
Kurt
Kurt,
WE did have a supermoto school at the UK CSS. YOu an contact those guys and see if they are still doing it.
Keith
http://www.superbikeschool.com/uk/
#7
Posted 15 October 2007 - 05:44 PM
I did crash on one of this left turn on this one canyon, and the error was my body position was wrong (Riding twisted, turning left and my body kind of leaning to the right). I was scraping my left foot peg, anyways Saturday October 13 2007, I took your Level I class. Cobie Fair was my instructor and he able to spot my body position and correct my error right away (which if I went to your school sooner, I might not crash) also I be able to learn how to relax!!!. I input too much pressure on both of the bars and fighting and fighting. Dylan Code is my instructor for the Relax Drill or Rider Input Drill. And it is very interesting how the bike turning so smooth when I just RELAX.
My point is that if I take your Level I class before, I wouldn't crash or would crash on the different error that I didn't know yet. However, Level I covering common mistake that rider might have, usually give more information before you press the Panic Button!
Anyways, THANK YOU VERY MUCH to you and all the Staff!! I will take Level II as soon as the 2008 schedule come out.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Far Jangtrakool
Level I - Oct 13 #18 Yellow Group
#8
Posted 27 September 2008 - 03:58 AM
I love you guys!
Bennett
#9
Posted 29 September 2008 - 04:22 AM
I dunno if you remember me but I was at Mid-Ohio July 05 fpr the beginner 2-day. You gave me some great compliments and the ned and I really appreciate it. I tried to insert a pic of us togehter but it wouldn't work.
I hope I can do the advnaced 2-day in 2009 as I need to start racing in order to qulaify for my dream of racing in the Manx GP in 2010 or 2011! Oh and now my new rider wife wants to take the course and start racing too! God, this sport has become a money pit lol!
Cheers.
John
#10
Posted 29 September 2008 - 06:53 PM
Bennett, on Sep 27 2008, 03:58 AM, said:
I love you guys!
Bennett
Hi Bennett,
I was just having a quick look at this, and was curious if you had done Level 2 yet?
Best,
Cobie
#11
Posted 27 March 2009 - 06:48 PM
#12
Posted 15 October 2009 - 02:54 AM
It looks like many students have attended the school, then gone off to put some time in practicing the skills learnt, reflect and then go back to further sharpen their technique and understanding. I ask, is there anything wrong with doing back to back levels?
With the way I was riding at the track (2close calls and 1 crash), I was better off getting all that I could from the school before going track side again. But am I selling myself short by not letting the sequential levels mature into my riding before advancing?
Thankyou. I lookforward to attending the Australian CSS in December. Cheers
#13
Posted 15 October 2009 - 09:52 AM
6blade07, on Oct 15 2009, 03:54 AM, said:
It looks like many students have attended the school, then gone off to put some time in practicing the skills learnt, reflect and then go back to further sharpen their technique and understanding. I ask, is there anything wrong with doing back to back levels?
With the way I was riding at the track (2close calls and 1 crash), I was better off getting all that I could from the school before going track side again. But am I selling myself short by not letting the sequential levels mature into my riding before advancing?
Thankyou. I lookforward to attending the Australian CSS in December. Cheers

Hi again,
Is there anything wrong with doing the levels back to back...? well, When I was a student, I did 2 days back to back, and I can tell you from that knowledge and experience, you get to the end and it's a bit like, WOW, my brain can't take it all in. Your talking 5 drills on track per day, and some of them have actually got more, two off track drills as well. It's a lot to understand and apply.
When people ask me whats the best way to go, I'd say this, if you can do a 2 day camp where you get more time to do the drills, more time to practice, thats a really optimal way to do 2 days. If you try and do the normal school day after day, after day, I think you'll plataeu, and not maximise your investment in yourself and your tracktime.
It is of course, entirely personal, everyone learns and is able to learn at their own pace, but I think 2 days max, in one go. Others may have other experience where they've been able to do it, but most students are shot by lunchtime of day 2 on a normal school back to back.
Bullet
#14
Posted 15 October 2009 - 11:34 PM
What I have observed is that often 1 day is a very steep learning curve, especially for the first time track rider and the first time student to our school. In most cases, I think we get a better result with doing 2 days, one after the other.
Student gets used to the training program, the coaches, the format, the track. 2nd day, he can concentrate even more on the skills.
However, it does take some self-discipline to not "try and do it all at once". In other words, there is a lot of info as Bullet mentions, and you have to cut yourself a little slack to not be perfect on every technique, every session, but allow yourself to work on one thing at a time and if the others suffer a little, that's OK.
Also, with 2 days together, we have a better chance of really sorting the rider out, make sure we have the optimum pairing of coach/student too.
Finally, when a student has 2 days, he/she is typically more patient with themselves, and not too worried about "GOTTA LEARN IT ALL RIGHT NOW!!!!!!"
CF
#15
Posted 19 October 2009 - 12:30 AM
What I got out of the school was the information and techniques necessary to rid myself of the bad habits I had been "perfecting" for several years.
In my opinion, if you have been doing it wrong for years you probably won't undo it all in a couple days... that would be too easy, life doesn't seem to work that way. By the same token, if you haven't had any experience on a motorcycle to speak of you probably won't be the next great racer after 2 days either.
In my two days at the school I learned about all the things I had been doing wrong and I learned the correct techniques to PRACTICE to do it right.
I highly recommend doing the days back-to-back but no matter what format you choose you'll have to practice, that is inescapable. Do the school, learn the drills... PRACTICE.
#16
Posted 19 October 2009 - 03:28 AM
But I am super keen to learn how to do it right. I know I won't master it over night but at least now I will be focused with definate direction and goals to acheive during track sessions post CSS. As opposed to going out there, having a crack and maybe a stack.
Your opinions carry much weight and mean everything to me at the moment. With your insightfull feedback I have been able to realisticaly guage attending the classes and have decided to go with levels 1&2 back to back, then 3&4 back to back with a 2 day break between both blocks - yeah, a tight schedule and I know Im going to be pretty fatigued. But Im going to relate it to when I did consecutive trackdays and 2 days rest between should be enough.
As far as info overload goes, I just want to build a good, CORRECT, solid base to begin my learning from. If I can walk away with that foundation/base then I would have acheived exactly what I am after. Thankyou all again for your input
Regards RD
#17
Posted 19 October 2009 - 06:07 AM
#18
Posted 19 October 2009 - 05:17 PM
Coffee and soda are diuretics, actually dehydrate you.
Water should start at a half gallon, that's the beginning amount, then go up from there--can easily go to a gallon, 1.5 or even 2 on a hot day.
Gatorade, and other electrolyte drinks: some seem to work better than others. We have used Cytomax, that seems to work well. I've also made my own lemonade, like that. Gatorade has a bit more sugar than I like.
Water is the key for most, drinking enough, and start early (like that morning, before riding).
As a side note, one article I read showed the US Army figured on a hot 90-100 day, a man working outside could need 13 liters. I've heard the guys in the desert go to 14-16 liters, and in the jungle up to 22 liters.
CF
#19
Posted 19 October 2009 - 07:32 PM
#20
Posted 20 October 2009 - 11:13 PM
lwarner, on Oct 19 2009, 08:32 PM, said:
Good, thanks for bringing that up. I think we ought to put up a thread on this and little more detail, maybe pin the thread. I'll work on this over the winter if not before.
CF

Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote






