mugget Posted January 12, 2012 Report Share Posted January 12, 2012 Kind of carrying on from the Contact patch Vs grip thread, I was doing some further reading on Steve's website and out of the blue came across an answer to a question I had long wondered about. If you look at race bikes, whether it's at a local or national race, World Superbike or MotoGP, it has always stood out to me that the seat height is noticeably higher than on production street bikes. I thought this was just to do with body position. I never thought it could have been because a higher centre of gravity is more desirable for cornering, because whenever I had been riding my BMX around MTB and fire trails etc. I always got around corners faster than guys riding MTBs. I figured it was because of the lower centre of gravity, so I always thought that lower CoG = better. Not so! From: http://www.stevemund.../leanangle.html What's the real lean angle? The concept of the lean angle is not as trivial as one would imagine. If we had infinitely thin tires then it'd be obvious: Just draw a line from the center of mass to the contact point and measure the angle between that line and the horizontal or vertical. But we have fat tires. The actual lean angle must be measured from the center of mass to the center of the contact area, which will be to the inside of the tire. So the apparent lean angle — using a line parallel to the forks, say — will be greater than the actual lean angle, using the center of the contact area of the tire. Note that this means that a motorcycle with a lower center of mass will lean more than a motorcycle with a higher center of mass, for a given corner radius and speed. Well, hot damn! Mystery solved! (For me at least.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.